|
|
Post by matthew abagnale on Mar 8, 2011 1:15:50 GMT -7
--- pretentious bull, astrid. when you look at it from a biological/psychological perspective, it loses all its romantic connotations.
|
|
|
|
Post by astrid machiavelli on Mar 8, 2011 1:18:46 GMT -7
completely beside the point. you asked for what i thought and i told you.
|
|
|
|
Post by matthew abagnale on Mar 9, 2011 10:31:42 GMT -7
--- i know i know, i'm just surprised is all.
|
|
|
|
Post by astrid machiavelli on Mar 9, 2011 17:34:07 GMT -7
|
|
|
|
Post by matthew abagnale on Mar 13, 2011 7:03:52 GMT -7
--- 'cause you strike me as a free spirit, and there isn't anything less freeing than monogamous relationships.
|
|
|
|
Post by astrid machiavelli on Mar 13, 2011 19:23:00 GMT -7
i think there's something liberating about being in a solid relationship, though. well, not even that, but... i don't know. you must agree with me to an extent, right? you are getting married, after all.
|
|
|
|
Post by matthew abagnale on Mar 14, 2011 14:43:46 GMT -7
--- i love your sister, obviously, but i wouldn't say she's my soulmate. i know this sounds a bit harsh, but if something happened between the two of us, it's inevitable that we'd both move on. that's not really soulmate-y, is it?
|
|
|
|
Post by astrid machiavelli on Mar 14, 2011 23:03:31 GMT -7
i guess not, but you love her and i highly doubt anything will happen to you two. you're young and in love.
|
|
